Skip to main content

Between IPQ5424 and IPQ5018: The Evolution from WiFi 6 to WiFi 7 SoC Comprehensive Comparison

 As wireless communication technology continues to evolve rapidly, WiFi 6 (802.11ax) and WiFi 7 (802.11be) have become core drivers of the latest generation of wireless devices. Qualcomm’s IPQ5424 (WiFi 7 SoC) and IPQ5018 (WiFi 6 SoC) represent two different generations of wireless networking SoCs. This article offers a comprehensive analysis of these two solutions—from core architecture to wireless capabilities, processing power, I/O interfaces, power consumption, and application scenarios—to help OEMs, ODMs, and developers make better product decisions.

1. Basic Specifications Comparison

SpecificationIPQ5424 (WiFi 7)IPQ5018 (WiFi 6)
CPU ArchitectureQuad-core ARM Cortex-A53Dual-core ARM Cortex-A53
Clock SpeedUp to 1.5GHz (configurable)Up to 1.0GHz
WiFi Standard802.11be (WiFi 7)802.11ax (WiFi 6)
Frequency Bands2.4GHz + 5GHz + 6GHz2.4GHz + 5GHz
MIMO Configuration2x2 supported (each band)2x2 supported (each band)
PHY Rate288+ Mbps per stream (6GHz)~240 Mbps per stream (5GHz)
OFDMA / MU-MIMOSupported (UL/DL)Supported (UL/DL)
QAM ModulationUp to 4096-QAMUp to 1024-QAM
Memory SupportDDR4 / DDR3LDDR3L
Storage InterfacesNAND / NOR / SPI / USBNAND / NOR / SPI
Ethernet PortsUp to 1x 2.5GbE + 2x GbEUp to 2x GbE
Package TypeBGABGA
Industrial Temp RangeSupported (certain models)Supported
Security EngineWPA3, Trusted Execution (TEE)WPA3

2. In-Depth Key Differences
1. Wireless Performance & Generational Leap

  • The IPQ5424, designed for WiFi 7, supports tri-band operation (2.4G + 5G + 6G) and includes key WiFi 7 features such as 4096-QAM and Multi-Link Operation (MLO) . Its wireless throughput significantly surpasses that of the IPQ5018, especially in congested environments where stability and bandwidth aggregation are critical.
  • The IPQ5018, a WiFi 6 SoC targeting mid-to-entry-level applications, supports dual-band operation with 2x2 MIMO but lacks advanced WiFi 7 capabilities.

sales@wallystech.com


2. CPU & Multitasking Capabilities

  • The IPQ5424 uses a quad-core Cortex-A53, offering 1.5–2x more concurrent processing power than the dual-core IPQ5018. This makes it better suited for handling multiple users and simultaneous device connections.
  • For platforms like OpenWRT, OpenWiFi, or edge computing use cases, the additional cores in IPQ5424 enable faster system response and task scheduling.

3. I/O & Expandability

  • The IPQ5424 supports a 2.5GbE Ethernet port, making it ideal for high-throughput data transfer. It also includes rich I/O options such as PCIe, USB 3.0, NAND, and SPI—suited for advanced industrial or edge network devices.
  • The IPQ5018 provides a simpler I/O setup, which is sufficient for cost-sensitive applications such as home repeaters or small business APs.

4. Power Efficiency

  • The IPQ5018 has lower power consumption, ideal for lightweight deployments or temperature-constrained environments.
  • The IPQ5424 consumes more power but implements dynamic power management for a balanced performance-to-power ratio, making it suitable for performance-intensive scenarios.

3. Typical Use Case Comparison

Application TypeIPQ5424 AdvantagesIPQ5018 Advantages
Enterprise AP / Edge Gateway✅ Better performance, multi-core, 2.5GbE❌ Lacks high-end performance
Industrial CPE / Outdoor AP✅ Tri-band & industrial-grade options✅ Power-efficient, temperature-hardened
Home / SMB Routers✅ Superior tri-band experience✅ Low-cost and flexible deployment
Mesh Network Nodes✅ Supports enhanced WiFi 7 mesh features✅ Ideal for budget-conscious mesh networks
OpenWRT / OpenWiFi Dev.✅ More memory & interfaces for development✅ Good for entry-level customization

4. Future-Proofing & Ecosystem Value

  • IPQ5424 is positioned to be a mainstream mid-tier SoC for WiFi 7 over the next 3–5 years. It is compatible with front-end chips like QCN9274/QCN6274, making it ideal for building powerful tri-band platforms.
  • IPQ5018 remains a mature and stable solution in the WiFi 6 ecosystem. With its low BOM cost and wide deployment base, it’s still an attractive choice for cost-effective projects.

5. Conclusion
The comparison between IPQ5424 and IPQ5018 mirrors the broader technological evolution from WiFi 6 to WiFi 7. With enhanced wireless capabilities, higher processing power, and improved expandability, IPQ5424 stands out as the SoC of choice for next-generation networking devices. Meanwhile, IPQ5018 continues to offer solid performance for budget-conscious and legacy WiFi 6 deployments.
Recommendations:

  • Choose IPQ5424 if your project demands tri-band concurrency, high throughput, and enterprise-grade features.
  • Choose IPQ5018 for cost-effective, dual-band solutions with power efficiency.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Qualcomm's IPQ53XX Series: IPQ5300, IPQ5332, IPQ5322 Comprehensive Analysis

  As wireless networking technology continues to evolve, Qualcomm has introduced the IPQ53XX series chipsets to meet the market’s demand for high-speed, stable, and versatile network devices. This series includes several notable models, with IPQ5300, IPQ5332, and IPQ5322 being key highlights. This article will provide a comprehensive overview of these three chips and their advantages in various networking applications. 1. IPQ5300: The Efficient Mid-Range Choice The IPQ5300 is designed for mid-range network devices and boasts the following key features: Multi-Core Architecture : Equipped with a quad-core CPU, the IPQ5300 is capable of handling network data and multitasking efficiently. WiFi 6 Support : This chip supports the 802.11ax (WiFi 6) standard, offering faster transmission speeds and lower latency, ideal for homes and small offices. Network Acceleration : Includes a built-in network acceleration engine to optimize traffic handling and device performance, ensuring a smooth us...
Post a Comment
Read more

IPQ4018 vs IPQ5018: Comprehensive Performance Comparison

 ## IPQ4018 vs IPQ5018: Comprehensive Performance Comparison ### Introduction The IPQ4018 and IPQ5018 are both high-performance system-on-chip (SoC) solutions from Qualcomm, designed for wireless networking applications. This article provides a detailed comparison of these two SoCs, examining their performance, features, and suitability for different applications. ### Architecture and Processing Power #### IPQ4018 - **CPU**: Quad-core ARM Cortex-A7 - **Frequency**: Up to 717 MHz - **Process**: 28nm - **Cache**: L2 cache support #### IPQ5018 - **CPU**: Quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 - **Frequency**: Up to 1.0 GHz - **Process**: 28nm - **Cache**: Larger L2 cache compared to IPQ4018 **Comparison**: The IPQ5018 features a more advanced ARM Cortex-A53 architecture, providing better performance per clock cycle and higher overall processing power due to its increased frequency. ### Wireless Capabilities #### IPQ4018 - **Wi-Fi Standards**: 802.11ac Wave 2 - **Bands**: Dual-band (2.4GHz and 5GHz)...
Post a Comment
Read more

Efficient application of DBDC MT7915+MT7916 in IPQ4019/IPQ4029wifi router|Wallys

  Efficient application of DBDC MT7915+MT7916 in IPQ4019/IPQ4029wifi router|Wallys The difference between MT7915 and MT7916 MT7915 and MT7916 are two Wi-Fi 6 chips launched by MediaTek. Their main difference lies in the process and functional characteristics. First of all, MT7916 adopts a more advanced 6nm process, compared with MT7915 adopts 12nm process, so MT7916 has certain advantages in terms of power consumption and performance. Secondly, in terms of functional characteristics, MT7916 has the following advantages over MT7915: 1. Higher maximum rate: The maximum rate of MT7916 can reach 4.8Gbps, which is higher than 3.6Gbps of MT7915. 2. More spatial streams: MT7916 supports 8x8 MU-MIMO, while MT7915 only supports 4x4 MU-MIMO, so MT7916 has better performance when multiple users transmit data at the same time. 3. More advanced scheduling algorithm: MT7916 supports OFDMA, which can make more effective use of spectrum resources and improve network capacity and throughput. Overal...
Post a Comment
Read more